tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1612867235894979409.post6191605491551806357..comments2024-03-27T08:38:29.990+01:00Comments on artefactphil: Modern science's impoverished metaphysicsMichael Eldredhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15312973352124078686noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1612867235894979409.post-44677069786648044502013-06-03T11:05:02.278+02:002013-06-03T11:05:02.278+02:00The first person is always involved; so, properly ...The first person is always involved; so, properly speaking, it's a matter of bringing the phenomena of first-and-second person to the fore, rather than the exclusive scientific focus on the first-and-third person (subject-object). The first-and-second person can be called also you-and-me. A phenomenology of you-and-me demands questioning all the self-evidences of subject-object metaphysics.Michael Eldredhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15312973352124078686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1612867235894979409.post-51873272611027964162013-06-03T10:09:02.450+02:002013-06-03T10:09:02.450+02:00This comment has been removed by the author.Michael Eldredhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15312973352124078686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1612867235894979409.post-19201434132461278432013-06-03T06:04:33.432+02:002013-06-03T06:04:33.432+02:00And, so, what would be a "metaphysics of a se...And, so, what would be a "metaphysics of a second person"? And is there any place for the first person?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com